Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:368Hits:19885164Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID147319
Title ProperLearning from Israel? ‘26/11’ and the anti-politics of urban security governance
LanguageENG
AuthorMachold, Rhys
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article calls for a greater emphasis on issues of politics and anti-politics within critical debates about transnational security governance in the metropolis. While scholars have documented the growing popularity of policy ‘models’ and ‘best practices’ in policing and urban security planning, we know little about what makes these schemes attractive to the officials who enroll in them. I take the government of Maharashtra’s decision to ‘learn from Israel’ following the 2008 Mumbai attacks (26/11) as an invitation to re-evaluate the relationships among policymaking, politics, and depoliticization. Focusing on references to Israeli security know-how as a ‘best practice’ by Maharashtra state officials, I explore how an association with Israel was used to negotiate the conflicts and controversies that followed 26/11. The article has two aims: first, it addresses how transnational policy schemes work anti-politically within particular local contexts. Second, it locates counter-terrorism policy as a form of performative politics, which is generative of policy problems. In doing so, the article helps to reclaim the political contingency of policy responses to terroristic violence and addresses the agency of policy actors in the global South.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 47, No.4; Aug 2016: p.275-291
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol: 47 No 4
Key WordsCounter-Terrorism ;  Mumbai ;  Performativity ;  Best Practice ;  Policy Mobility


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text