| ID | 147383 |
| Title Proper | Agonistic democracy |
| Other Title Information | the endurance of the Gandhi and Nehru legacy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gaia von Hatzfeldt ; Von Hatzfeldt, Gaia |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper examines the political developments around the Anna Hazare-led anti-corruption movement that escalated in India through most of 2011. Although the overtone of the movement was primarily about corruption, my aim in this paper is to explore the debates regarding democracy that the movement unleashed. The accounts that this paper draws on focus on the tension and competition that arose during the anti-corruption movement amongst two civil society groups – ‘Team Anna’ and the National Campaign for the People’s Right to Information – regarding the meaning and practice of democracy. I argue that this conflict reflects a broader tension deeply rooted in democratic debates in India, traceable to the early nationalist debates during the anti-colonial Independence movement. These findings suggest that conflict and competition are crucial ingredients of democratic debate, contributing to the sustenance and enrichment of the idea of democracy. This argument is particularly timely, for it helps us to understand the rise to power of the Aam Aadmi Party. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary South Asia Vol. 24, No.2; Jun 2016: p.149-163 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary South Asia Vol: 24 No 2 |
| Key Words | Democracy ; Gandhi ; Nehru ; Agonistic Pluralism ; Anti-Corruption Movement |