| ID | 147809 |
| Title Proper | Challenge of reforming European communist legacy ‘logistics’ |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Young, Thomas-Durell |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article posits four key challenges to address the question as to why logistics reform in Communist-legacy defense institutions has been so slow. First, what is the conceptual foundation for logistics in these countries? Second, what is the general state of national logistics capabilities in these countries? Third, why has the reform of logistics in these post-Communist legacy defense institutions been so slow and superficial? Fourth, in an attempt to understand the problem better, what do legacy defense institutions need to do themselves in order to be able to adopt modern Western logistics concepts? Conversely, what do donor nations need to understand about these legacy logistics organizations the better to enable them to understand the immense gap that divides Communist from Western logistics concepts? In addressing these questions, the author will argue two points. First, logistics reform has been impeded to date by a lack of appreciation on the part of particularly Western officials that legacy logistics concepts could not be more antithetical to their Western counterparts. Second, reform of legacy logistics organizations will not follow from attention and resources directed at tactical-level formations and importing the expeditionary logistics concept. Rather, the causation of the continued inability to adopt Western logistics concepts can be found in national-level policy, financing, laws, and regulations that continue to enable the operation of legacy concepts. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Slavic Military Studies Vol. 29, No.3; Jul-Sep 2016: p.352-370 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Slavic Military Studies Vol: 29 No 3 |
| Key Words | Logistics ; Reforming European Communist Legacy ; Communist-Legacy Defense ; National-Level Policy |