Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:760Hits:19905435Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID147911
Title ProperStates, nations, and territorial stability
Other Title Informationwhy Chinese hegemony would be better for international order
LanguageENG
AuthorGriffiths, Ryan D
Summary / Abstract (Note)How would a hegemonic China shape international norms related to states, nations, and territoriality? Scholars have noted the conflict between the right of minority nations to self-determine and the right of states to maintain their territorial integrity. An unrestricted application of the former would risk considerable state fragmentation; an unconditional acceptance of the latter would condemn stateless nations to a subordinate status. Powerful actors like the United States have attempted to navigate these norms by specifying the conditions under which one norm should take precedence over the other, but such decisions are difficult to make in an international environment that lacks consensus, and the result is an ambiguous international order where conflict is common. I analyze the future of these norms in a Chinese-led international order, explaining why China would champion territorial integrity over self-determination, and why this would be better for territorial stability.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 25, No.3; Jul-Sep 2016: p.519-545
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 25 No 3
Key WordsNAtions ;  States ;  International Order ;  Chinese Hegemony ;  Territorial Stability


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text