| ID | 147963 |
| Title Proper | Explaining the behaviour of small states |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of Jordan's nuclear energy policy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | El-Anis, Imad |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Conventional analyses claim that small states bandwagon with leading international powers. The dominant view is that small states' vulnerabilities and limited power hinder their ability to pursue policy goals. This study critiques this position by investigating why and how Jordan continues to pursue a nuclear energy programme despite objections from the United States—its principal ally. By using theories of small states, this study analyses discursive practices in Jordanian policymaking. This approach is used to describe Jordan's nuclear energy policy and posit a logic of the effects that energy insecurity has on the government's perception of Jordan as a ‘small state’. I use this to create hypotheses concerning the conditions under which small states may not simply bandwagon with key international allies, but may have more freedom to pursue their goals than traditional analyses predict. Explanations that assume small states always have limited freedom to pursue policy goals without the backing of key allies are not supported by the evidence considered here. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 29, No.2; Jun 2016: p.528-547 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 29 No 2 |
| Key Words | Jordan ; Nuclear Energy Policy ; Behaviour of Small States |