Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1765Hits:19211599Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID148157
Title ProperBalance strikes back
Other Title Informationpower, perceptions, and ideology in Georgian foreign policy, 1992–2014
LanguageENG
AuthorOskanian, Kevork
Summary / Abstract (Note)Tbilisi’s recent foreign policy presents analysts working from a balance-of-power perspective with something of a puzzle: with Russia very much the regionally dominant power, against the predictions of structural-systemic theories, small state Georgia has ended up balancing against, rather than bandwagoning with, great power Moscow. As a result, domestic, ideological explanations that implausibly ignore or minimize interstate considerations of power have predominated in analyses of Tbilisi’s foreign policy. In response, this essay examines Georgia’s post-Soviet foreign policies from a neoclassical realist theoretical viewpoint, combining systemic, balance-of-power and domestic ideological factors: throughout the period under review, Tbilisi’s policies were thus due to ideologically conditioned perceptions of shifting power-political realities in its neighborhood, with an ideological adherence to liberal norms playing a particularly important role in distorting these perceptions during the Saakashvili administration. Through this combination of power and ideology, neoclassical realism ends up providing a more comprehensive and continuous account of Tbilisi’s shifting policies since 1992 than either domestic or alternative realist frameworks, like balance-of-threat theory, or omnibalancing; as an important implication, Georgia’s, and other former Soviet states’ continued pro-Western orientation will depend as much on their perceptions of the West’s continued commitment to regional power projection as on domestic ideological preferences.
`In' analytical NoteForeign Policy Analysis Vol. 12, No.4; Oct 2016: p.628-652
Journal SourceForeign Policy Analysis 2016-12 12, 4
Key WordsPower ;  Ideology ;  Perceptions ;  Georgian Foreign Policy ;  Balance Strikes Bac ;  1992–2014