| ID | 148451 |
| Title Proper | Hegemonic authority and domestic legitimation |
| Other Title Information | Japan and Korea under Chinese hegemonic order in early modern East Asia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lee, Ji-Young |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Some argue a powerful China will likely reestablish a Sinocentric tribute system in pursuit of hegemony in Asia. This line of argument, however, rests on misleading images of the Chinese empire while assuming hegemony is a product of a single agent and its activities. But, why do actors comply with, defy, or challenge hegemonic authority? I argue hegemony is not just an outcome of the material power of the preponderant state, but is constructed in interaction with other actors’ pursuit of domestic legitimation. The tribute system and Chinese hegemony in early modern East Asia were built on symbolic domination—Chinese views of how international politics should work determined what was socially acceptable and legitimate while regulating the range of choices other actors could make due to domestic consequences. It shows that crafty political leaders engaged in a form of symbolic politics that manipulated external recognition from the hegemon, but in ways that strengthened their positions against domestic opponents. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 25, No.2; Apr-Jun 2016: p.320-352 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 25 No 2 |
| Key Words | Japan ; Korea ; Hegemonic Authority ; Domestic Legitimation ; Chinese Hegemonic Order ; Early Modern East Asia |