Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:485Hits:19925655Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID148527
Title ProperAgreements and disputes crystalized by the 2009-2011 Sino-Philippine exchange of notes verbales and their relevance to the jurisdiction and admissibility phase of the South China Sea arbitration
LanguageENG
AuthorGau, Michael Sheng-ti
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper examines the evidences used by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration to conclude that Philippines’ Submissions 3-4 and 6-7 reflect disputes. The Jurisdictional Award uses certain notes verbales sent by the Philippines and China in April 2011 for this purpose. However, the plain wording of these notes verbales negates the existence of disputes concerning the legal status of nine maritime features identified by those four Submissions. The Tribunal overlooks the agreement reached in these notes verbales that some geological features in the Kalayaan Islands Group may generate Exclusive Economic Zone and continental shelf, which serve to defeat Philippines’ Submissions 5, 8, and 9 as well as the Philippines’ theory that China invokes historical rights to justify its law enforcement activities in the entire region within the U-Shaped Line.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 15, No.2; Jun 2016: p.417-430
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol: 15 No 2
Key WordsAgreements ;  South China Sea Arbitration ;  Disputes Crystalized ;  2009-2011 ;  Sino-Philippine


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text