| ID | 148533 |
| Title Proper | Dog that didn`t bark? EU crisis management and the Syrian crisis |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Karacasulu, Nilufer ; Karakir, Irem Askar |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Based on the commonly held assumptions about the inability of the European Union (EU) to cope with new challenges, this paper raises the question of whether the EU will assume greater responsibility for peace, especially in its neighborhood, in the short-term. It contributes to answering this question through focusing on EU mechanisms, instruments and policies of crisis management (civilian-military) since the 1990s, which is embodied in the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP). In March 2015, the European External Action Service (EEAS) presented a report on CSDP indicating problems in crisis management. Yet, the EU strives for efficient activities. It considered reviewing its neighborhood policy as well as Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) to enable more effective actions to deal with crises. Today, it has a huge “toolbox” to address crises. The EU attaches great importance to a coherent and comprehensive strategy in crisis situations. Observing that a comprehensive strategy of the EU was launched in early 2015 to deal with the crisis in Syria, this paper questions to what extent the EU`s new arguments for crisis management are realized in its regional strategy for Syria. While the Syrian crisis is still unfolding, its impacts on the EU in the form of rising terror attacks in Europe by Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and an unprecedented influx of migrants are remarkable. |
| `In' analytical Note | Korean Journal of Defence Analysis Vol. 28, No.4; Dec 2016: p.525-544 |
| Journal Source | Korean Journal of Defence Analysis Vol: 28 No 4 |
| Key Words | EU ; Syria ; CSDP ; Foreign Policy ; Crisis Management |