| ID | 148592 |
| Title Proper | Mexican standoff |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Farnsworth, Eric |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | A U.S. PRESIDENTIAL candidate publicly claimed that Mexico is a land of criminals, drug traffickers and rapists; rather than being forced to withdraw, he was rewarded with his party’s nomination. Is it any wonder that for generations, Mexican policymakers saw fit to define themselves in opposition to Washington? After the Mexican-American War, when the latter dispossessed the former of its vast lands north of the Rio Grande, bilateral relations historically were cool and formalistic, overlain by Mexico’s skepticism of the United States and an acute sense of sovereignty. Family and economic ties kept the relationship vibrant at local and regional levels, but the state of the official relationship was well captured by former president Porfirio Díaz, who reportedly lamented, “Poor Mexico [is] so far from God [and] so close to the United States.” |
| `In' analytical Note | National Interest ,No.146; Nov-Dec 2016: p.61-67 |
| Journal Source | National Interest 2016-11 |
| Key Words | America ; Mexican Standoff |