| ID | 148792 |
| Title Proper | Community at the border or the boundaries of community? the case of EU field diplomats |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hofius, Maren |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article contributes to the communities of practice (CoP) literature by focusing on the neglected role of the boundary in constructing community. It takes issue with advocates of International Relations’ (IR) most recent ‘practice turn’ who have overrated inclusive practices of linking to the detriment of taking account of exclusive practices of demarcation. A conceptual turn to the boundary, understood as a ‘site of difference’, highlights how the two sets of practices operate simultaneously in creating shared senses of belonging to a community. The article empirically probes this turn to the boundary by studying how the postmodern community of the European Union (EU) is (re)constructed by EU diplomats in its neighbouring state Ukraine. As a borderland, it symbolises an interstitial zone of high connectivity where the EU’s otherwise latent order is unearthed. A reconstructive analysis of interviews with members of this ‘community of practice’ reveals that they function as ‘boundary workers’ who engage in both boundary-spanning and boundary-drawing practices on an everyday basis. Zooming in on the ‘boundary work’ by EU diplomats exposes the complex process of community-building and thereby helps grasp community as an emergent structure of possibilities whose meaning is contextually mediated by its members’ social experience of the boundary. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 42, No.5; Dec 2016: p.939-967 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 42 No 5 |
| Key Words | European Union ; Diplomacy ; Ukraine ; Boundary ; Communities of Practice ; Practice Turn |