| ID | 149014 |
| Title Proper | When programming Trumps policy and plans |
| Other Title Information | the case of the US department of the navy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Young, Thomas-Durell |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Traditionally, policy and planning have been institutionally weak in the Naval Staff (Office of the Chief of Naval Operations – OPNAV). In their place, the N8 (Programming) has dominated resource decision-making, and, by default, decisions relating to policy and planning. Recent uncertainty over defense authorization and appropriations has resulted in calls for a greater role to be played by the N3/5, Policy and Plans Directorate. The article argues that reform of the Department of the Navy’s planning process is urgently needed. OPNAV’s weak planning and overly dominant programming practices are compared with those of the Departments of the Army and Air Force and are shown to be out of conformance with them. The article concludes with specific and detailed recommendations for reform of both the current planning and programming processes. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 39, No.7; Dec 2016: p.936-955 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 39 No 7 |
| Key Words | Planning ; Budgeting ; Defense Planning ; Programming ; US Department of the Navy ; Execution ; PPBE |