| ID | 149197 |
| Title Proper | Pragmatic and value-based argumentation in the 2015 Israeli elections |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Amossy, Ruth ; Kleczewski, David |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | A discursive and argumentative analysis of the Israeli 2015 elections reveals how electoral strategies displayed unexpected similarities between rival parties such as the Likud and the Zionist Union, on the one hand, and the Jewish Home and Meretz, on the other hand, in their respective approaches to foreign policy and to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. While the mainstream Right and Left mainly emphasized security motives, used consequence-based arguments, and appealed to fear, the practical reasoning of the two smaller parties (Jewish Home and Meretz) competing with the Likud and the Zionist Union applied a value-based rather than a merely instrumental argumentation. This reconfiguration of the political map enlightens the peculiar dynamics of the 2015 elections. |
| `In' analytical Note | Israel Affairs Vol. 22, No.3-4; Jul-Oct 2016: p.772-787 |
| Journal Source | Israel Affairs Vol: 22 No 3-4 |
| Key Words | Israeli Elections ; Political Argumentation ; Electoral Strategies ; Pragmatic Arguments ; Value-Based Arguments ; Appeal to Fear |