| ID | 149335 |
| Title Proper | Party versus faction in the reformed presidential nominating system |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Karol, David ; Cohen, Marty ; Noel, Hans ; Zaller, John |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Political scientists have devoted vastly more attention to general presidential elections than to party nominations for president. This emphasis might be reasonable if parties could be counted on to nominate generic representatives of their traditions. But it is clear that they cannot. Since the party reforms of the 1970s, regulars like Bill Clinton, Bob Dole, and Al Gore have sometimes won fairly easy nominations, but outsider candidates like Jimmy Carter and Howard Dean have made strong runs or even won. 2016 has produced extremes of both types: ultimate regular Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side and far outsider Donald Trump on the Republican side. It seems, moreover, that party regulars are having more difficulty in recent cycles than they did in the 1980s and 1990s. There is therefore some urgency to the question: when and why do party regulars tend to win nominations? |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 49, No.4; Oct 2016: p.701-708 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics 2016-12 49, 4 |
| Key Words | Faction ; Party Versus ; Reformed Presidential Nominating System |