ID | 149741 |
Title Proper | Which public? whose goods? what we know (and what we don't) about public goods in rural China |
Language | ENG |
Author | Newland, Sara A |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | What have we learned from a decade of research on the provision of public goods in the Chinese countryside? This review article surveys the literature in political science, economics and Chinese area studies. It describes the three dominant types of explanations for variation in the quality of public goods: local elections, social sanctioning and economic policies. It then argues that these findings are plagued by a set of common problems. Scholars mean different things when they use the term “public goods,” making their findings difficult to compare. Furthermore, the most common measures of public goods ignore the ways in which local officials manipulate statistics to enhance their career prospects and the interconnected nature of geographic-administrative units in the Chinese state. I suggest some ways to address these problems, and make recommendations for new directions in research on the topic. |
`In' analytical Note | China Quarterly , No.228; Dec 2016: p.881-904 |
Journal Source | China Quarterly No 228 |
Key Words | Political Economy ; China ; Public goods ; Rural Politics |