| ID | 150008 |
| Title Proper | Hinkley Point decision |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of the policy process |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Thomas, Stephen |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In 2006, the British government launched a policy to build nuclear power reactors based on a claim that the power produced would be competitive with fossil fuel and would require no public subsidy. A decade later, it is not clear how many, if any, orders will be placed and the claims on costs and subsidies have proved false. Despite this failure to deliver, the policy is still being pursued with undiminished determination. The finance model that is now proposed is seen as a model other European countries can follow so the success or otherwise of the British nuclear programme will have implications outside the UK. This paper contends that the checks and balances that should weed out misguided policies, have failed. It argues that the most serious failure is with the civil service and its inability to provide politicians with high quality advice – truth to power. It concludes that the failure is likely to be due to the unwillingness of politicians to listen to opinions that conflict with their beliefs. Other weaknesses include the lack of energy expertise in the media, the unwillingness of the public to engage in the policy process and the impotence of Parliamentary Committees. |
| `In' analytical Note | Energy Policy Vol. 96, No.96; Sep 2016: p.421–431 |
| Journal Source | Energy Policy 2016-09 96, 96 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Power ; UK ; Policy Process ; Hinkley Point |