ID | 150100 |
Title Proper | Questioning the holy trinity |
Other Title Information | why the U.S. nuclear triad still makes sense |
Language | ENG |
Author | Futter, Andrew ; Williams, Heather |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Despite renewed enthusiasm for nuclear disarmament, a contemporary security environment far removed from that of the Cold War, and increasing budgetary pressures at home, U.S. interests continue to be best served by retaining a triad of nuclear forces. While options for a reduced force structure may appear to offer short-term political and economic expediency, in the long run a three-legged deterrent—possibly consisting of fewer delivery vehicles, operational warheads and even potentially de-alerted forces—represents the best way to balance the competing requirements of contemporary and future U.S. nuclear policy. Indeed, it may be that retaining the triad provides the most realistic method of reestablishing U.S.-Russia strategic stability, and the most credible basis for advancing the drive for global nuclear reductions, strengthening global nuclear security, and even working toward nuclear abolition. |
`In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol. 35, No.4; 2016: p. 246-259 |
Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol: 35 No 4 |
Key Words | Nuclear Disarmament ; U.S. Interests ; Holy Trinity ; U.S. Nuclear Triad |