Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:883Hits:19637251Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID151189
Title ProperEmbodying algorithmic war
Other Title Informationgender, race, and the posthuman in drone warfare
LanguageENG
AuthorWilcox, Lauren
Summary / Abstract (Note)Through a discussion of drone warfare, and in particular the massacre of 23 people in the Uruzgan province in Afghanistan in 2010, I argue that drone warfare is both embodied and embodying. Drawing from posthuman feminist theorists such as Donna Haraway and N Katherine Hayles, I understand the turn toward data and machine intelligence not as an other-than-human process of decisionmaking that deprives humans of sovereignty, but as a form of embodiment that reworks and undermines essentialist notions of culture and nature, biology and technology. Through the intermediation of algorithmic, visual, and affective modes of embodiment, drone warfare reproduces gendered and racialized bodies that enable a necropolitics of massacre. Finally, the category of gender demonstrates a flaw in the supposed perfectibility of the algorithm in removing issues of identity or prejudice from security practices, as well as the perceptions of drone assemblages as comprising sublime technologies of perfect analysis and vision. Gender as both a mode of embodiment and a category of analysis is not removed by algorithmic war, but rather is put into the service of the violence it enables.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 48, No.1; Feb 2017: p.11-28
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol: 48 No 1
Key WordsGender ;  Visuality ;  Affect ;  Embodiment ;  Drones


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text