| ID | 151227 |
| Title Proper | Camp David and Dayton |
| Other Title Information | comparing Jimmy Carter and Richard Holbrooke as mediators |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Karčic, Hamza |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | U.S. mediation towards resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict in the 1970s and Balkan conflicts in the 1990s may not seem comparable at first. Differences between these conflicts in terms of history, duration and dynamics abound. The nature and level of U.S. involvement provides further contrasts. Yet, the Camp David negotiations in 1978 and the Dayton Peace Talks in 1995 offer striking parallels in terms of third-party mediator actions undertaken. This article compares the two summits by applying the analytic framework developed by Curran, Sebenius and Watkins to categorize third party mediator strategies. The analysis builds on this framework and deduces common tactics employed by third-party mediators at Camp David and Dayton. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Negotiation Vol. 22, No.1; 2017: p.1 – 32 |
| Journal Source | International Negotiation Vol: 22 No 1 |
| Key Words | Arab-Israeli conflict ; Mediation ; Balkan Conflic ; Dayton Peace Talks ; Camp David Negotiations |