Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1629Hits:19378591Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID151298
Title ProperAnalysing interventionism beyond conventional foreign policy rationales
Other Title Informationthe engagement of Brazil in the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH)
LanguageENG
AuthorGomes, Maíra Siman
Summary / Abstract (Note)Most of the analysis dealing with so-called “emerging powers” in the field of peace and security seek to explain the intentions and motivations (supposedly) behind these states’ foreign policy and changing normative positions. Several of those studies see foreign policy decisions as the result of rational processes, defined by a “means-and-ends” logic, essentially oriented by preconceived national interests, clear ideational precepts and fixed identities. Through a non-conventional analysis of the participation of Brazil in the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), the paper aims to advance an understanding of foreign policy as an identity practice that, especially in moments of domestic identity crisis, helps reinforce and stabilize specific representations of the state self and of those acting in its name. Informed by a post-positivist approach, the case discussed in the paper opens some avenues to explore how interventionism can be analysed beyond traditional foreign policy rationales and mainstream international relations theories.
`In' analytical NoteCambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 29, No.3; Sep 2016: p.852-869
Journal SourceCambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 29 No 3
Key WordsBrazil ;  Haiti ;  United Nations Stabilization Mission ;  Interventionism ;  MINUSTAH ;  Conventional Foreign Policy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text