| ID | 151421 |
| Title Proper | Drone strikes and grand strategy |
| Other Title Information | toward a political understanding of the uses of unmanned aerial vehicle attacks in US security policy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hazelton, Jacqueline L |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyzes the political utility of US drone strikes theoretically and deductively. Placing strikes within the context of the theorized political functions of force and considering how they fit into two grand strategies, restraint and selective engagement, I argue that these strikes buy the United States relatively little in the way of political effects assuring its own security because the terrorism threat they are intended to combat is a limited one within the skein of US global interests. Furthermore, their contribution to counter-terrorism efforts is likely to diminish with the adoption of armed drones by non-state actors. Drone strikes can, however, provide leverage over recalcitrant US client states while reassuring liberal partners and giving them some leverage over US choices. In addition, within the counter-terrorism sphere, drone strikes are less likely to inflame popular opinion than are alternative uses of force. This analysis contributes to an increasingly rigorous examination of the strikes’ role in US foreign and security policy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 40, No.1-2; Feb 2017: p.68-91 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 40 No 1-2 |
| Key Words | Counterinsurgency ; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ; Counterterrorism ; Grand Strategy ; Drones |