Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:621Hits:20132546Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID151760
Title ProperJust war theory & the conduct of asymmetric warfare
LanguageENG
AuthorWeiner, Allen S
Summary / Abstract (Note)A central element of the dominant view of just war theory is the moral equality of soldiers: combatants have equal rights to wage war against one another and are entitled to certain protections if captured, without regard to which side's cause of war is just. But whether and how this principle should apply in asymmetric armed conflicts between states and nonstate groups is profoundly unsettled. I argue that we should confer war rights on fighters for nonstate groups when they are engaged in violence that has risen to the level of armed conflict, and when the state against which the war is being waged is not entitled to assert its monopoly on the legitimate exercise of force, either because 1) the nonstate group has established sufficient control over territory to assert its own governing authority; or 2) because the group is located abroad. Conferring war rights on nonstate fighters does not, however, permit them to engage in acts that violate the laws of war. Fighters who commit such violations are individually subject to prosecution without regard to their group's entitlement to war rights.
`In' analytical NoteDaedalus Vol. 146, No.1; Winter 2017: p.59-70
Journal SourceDaedalus Vol: 146 No 1
Key WordsAsymmetric Warfare ;  Just War Theory ;  Governing Authority


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text