| ID | 151991 |
| Title Proper | International mediation and Australian foreign policy |
| Other Title Information | building institutional capacity to respond to overseas conflict |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Shea, Nathan ; Langmore, John ; Martin, Aran |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In October 2012, Australia's parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade recommended that a mediation support unit should be created within the Australian Agency for International Development, a department now amalgamated with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The question is: Does Australia possess the motivation and capacity to implement active and effective international mediation by building the capacity of intermediaries to deploy various peacemaking methods to hasten de-escalation at different stages of a conflict? If not, is a mediation support unit an appropriate initiative to address this capability gap? This article draws on quantitative conflict data sets and an expert panel to conclude that Australia's track record demonstrates significant capacity to undertake international mediation, but that the mediation personnel and processes available to government are insufficiently resourced and coordinated to readily provide policymakers with accessible tools to undertake the diverse range of mediation strategies advocated by conflict scholars. While a mediation support unit would address some of these issues, at present it conflicts with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's institutional philosophy based on diffused expertise. |
| `In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 71, No.1; Feb 2017: p. 88-104 |
| Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 71 No 1 |
| Key Words | Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Australia ; Peacemaking ; Mediation ; Contingency Approach |