Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:807Hits:19860583Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID152023
Title ProperFrom nationalism to factionalism:
Other Title Informationfaultlines in the Naga insurgency
LanguageENG
AuthorPanwar, Namrata
Summary / Abstract (Note)Do ceasefires or peace talks create fragmentation in the insurgent groups? Rather than proposing claims that can offer predictions about armed groups behaviour under ceasefires or peace processes, the analysts tend to focus largely on the dynamics between state and non-state actor. The experts pay little attention to overtime changes in social and local political context which might contribute to propelling a rebel group towards fragmentation and factionalism. The present study intends to fill this gap by exploring the shifting role of public opinion and ethnic support for the peace talks to ascertain whether it can increase the likelihood of factionalism in rebel groups or not. This article applies this approach to the case of Naga National Movement (1947–2015) in India, and finds that the proposed variable appears to have increased the frequency of factionalism in the movement.
`In' analytical NoteSmall Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 28, No.1; Feb 2017: p. 233-258
Journal SourceSmall Wars and Insurgencies Vol: 28 No 1
Key WordsFactionalism ;  Group Cohesion ;  Peace Talks ;  Ceasefires ;  Naga National Movement ;  Large-Scale Counterinsurgency Operations