Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:383Hits:19958752Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID152073
Title ProperPolitics of Pacific Ocean conservation
Other Title Information lessons from the Pitcairn islands marine reserve
LanguageENG
AuthorDauvergne, Peter ;  Alger, Justin
Summary / Abstract (Note)Drawing on seventy-four interviews, this article analyzes the rising importance since the mid-2000s of large marine protected areas (MPAs) as a policy for managing ocean conservation. Governments have initiated eighteen large MPAs (over 200,000 km2) since 2006, reflecting the emergence of a new large MPA norm in marine conservation. This norm, we argue, emerged because of the success of a few transnational nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in identifying politically feasible large MPAs, and then forming ad hoc domestic coalitions to lobby for them. This explanation is in contrast to most of the literature on how and why norms diffuse internationally, as well as existing explanations for the rise of large MPAs, both of which emphasize the importance of cohesive coalitions of transnational NGOs lobbying in multilateral venues. This bottom-up, international norm diffusion strategy has made large MPAs a viable policy option, one national jurisdiction at a time. For instance, this strategy was a critical element in convincing the UK to create the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve (835,000 km2) in 2015. Given the politics underlying the formation of large MPAs, where political gains have been high, and corporate and societal resistance relatively low, the creation of more large MPAs would seem likely, as occurred in 2016 when the UK announced it would designate three more large MPAs by 2020, totalling over 1.4 million km2. Growing support for large MPAs as a conservation strategy could also embolden states to establish large MPAs in more politically and economically contested waters, including on the Pacific high seas.
`In' analytical NotePacific Affairs Vol. 90, No.1; Mar 2017: p.29-50
Journal SourcePacific Affairs Vol: 90 No 1
Key WordsNGOs ;  Pacific Ocean ;  Exclusive Economic Zone ;  Marine Protected Areas ;  Politics of Asia-Pacific Conservation ;  International Norm Diffusion ;  Pew Charitable Trusts ;  National Geographic Society ;  Conservation International ;  Commercial Fishing


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text