| ID | 152096 |
| Title Proper | Role conflict and the limits of state identity |
| Other Title Information | the case of Indonesia in democracy promotion |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Karim, Moch Faisal |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper aims to analyse why Indonesia projects democracy as a state identity by taking on the role of democracy promoter? This paper argues that Indonesia's aspiring role as a democracy promoter is not a manifestation of a firm and coherent democratic political culture, which is more likely to be a permanent feature of states. Thus, rather than seeing it as firmly established state identity, instead, Indonesia's democratic identity should be seen as role conception articulated by foreign policy elites in its quest for international prestige. Its role as a democracy promoter has enabled Indonesia to enhance its other roles conceptions such as a regional leader in Southeast Asia as well as a bridge-builder at the global level. However, this paper further argues that Indonesia's role as a democracy promoter has also been hindered due to the inter-role conflicts arising from its enactment of multiple roles. As a result, Indonesia's enactment of the role as democracy promoter has relatively less impactful towards democratization in the region. To substantiate this argument, the paper examines Indonesia's strategies in promoting democracy and human rights in three case studies, namely Indonesia's role in mainstreaming human rights in ASEAN, Indonesia's democracy promotion through the Bali Democracy Forum, and Indonesia's engagement towards democratization in Myanmar. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 30, No.3; May 2017: p.385-404 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 30 No 3 |
| Key Words | ASEAN ; Myanmar ; Democracy Promotion ; Indonesian Foreign Policy ; Role Theory ; Bali Democracy Forum |