| ID | 153044 |
| Title Proper | Is strategic studies narrow? critical security and the misunderstood scope of strategy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Vennesson, Pascal |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Critical security advocates commonly portray strategic studies as crippled by its narrow focus on Cold War-era military issues, as state-centric and as Western-centric. I argue that this conception of the scope of strategy is flawed and I offer a comprehensive rebuttal by working out the logic of the theories advanced by Carl von Clausewitz and Thomas Schelling. The proponents of critical security overlook the striking expansion of strategy during the Cold War, its longstanding inclusion of competing political actors not just states, as well as its capacity to put Western and non-Western actors in a common analytic frame. By breaking out of the conceptual jails in which strategy has been incarcerated, I seek to reconnect International Relations to strategic thought from which it has become increasingly estranged. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 40, No.3; Apr 2017: p.358-391 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 40 No 3 |
| Key Words | State ; Military Power ; Critical Security Studies ; West ; Strategic Studies ; Cold War ; Clausewitz (Carl Von) ; Schelling (Thomas C.) |