Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:536Hits:20445120Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID153315
Title ProperContestability ‘theory’, its links with Australia’s competition policy, and recent international trade and investment agreements
LanguageENG
AuthorColton, Caroline
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines how contestable market theory (contestability) has come to reconfigure the economic and regulatory concept of competition in order to enhance the compatibility of Australia’s economy with international trade and investment agreements. Australia has recently negotiated and signed a raft of bilateral, plurilateral and regional agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and the Australia–China Free Trade Agreement. In order to ensure that Australia meets its obligations and commitments to these agreements, two key advisory bodies—the Harper Panel on Competition Policy Review and the Financial System Inquiry—made recommendations, the majority of which were accepted by the government, to ready Australia’s competition governance and economic policy for greater global integration. Such impact is dependent on, among other things, how domestic competition policy meshes with the free market ideology underpinning such international agreements, which favours the breakdown of barriers to markets. Less well known is the role of contestability in radicalising ideology as it countenances monopolisation and privatisation in the guise of market access by justifying the substitution of actual competition with the mere threat of competition. The article concludes that the monopoly power of transnational corporations will be enhanced through the acquiescence of governments to the new governance regime of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which, supported by domestic policy, is set to redraw competition policy in the light of contestability theory.
`In' analytical NoteAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 71, No.3; Jun 2017: p.315-334
Journal SourceAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 71 No 3
Key WordsInvestment ;  Competition Policy ;  Market Access ;  Trade Liberalisation ;  Competition Law ;  Competition and Consumer Act 2010 ;  Contestability ;  Contestable MarketTheory ;  Investor–StateDispute Settlement (ISDS) ;  Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA)


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text