| ID | 153728 |
| Title Proper | North Korea's hegemonic rule and its collapse |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Choi, Yong Sub |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Ideological leadership through the Party was at the core of the North Korean leaders’ hegemonic rule over the people, which resulted in the great popularity of Kim Il-sung. Marketisation in the wake of the economic crisis, however, significantly impaired the mechanism for rule by consent, especially by triggering the influx of outside information and undermining the Party's ideological education activities. The economic crisis led the state to adjust the mechanism of consent and coercion in such a way that the state's control over society could be restored by relying more on rule by force, which was demonstrated by the much stricter penal system, bloody purges and, most of all, military-first politics. This, nonetheless, was a temporary measure because, in Guha's terms, ‘dominance without hegemony’ would not be durable in the long term. The regime can sustain itself in the long-term only through the reinstatement of the consent mechanism, which disintegrated owing to the marketisation. However, as the marketisation, being beneficial to those who have power as well as ordinary people, is irreversible in North Korea today, the reestablishment of hegemonic rule would not be attainable. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 30, No.5; Sep 2017: p.783-800 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 30 No 5 |
| Key Words | North Korea ; Hegemony ; Coercion ; Marketisation ; Consent ; Gramsci |