| ID | 153875 |
| Title Proper | Polyarchies, competitive oligarchies or inclusive hegemonies? a comparison of 23 global intergovernmental organizations based on Robert Dahl’s political theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lopes, Dawisson Belem |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, I assume that global intergovernmental organizations (GIGOs) function as enablers of interstate liberal politics by way of their multilateral institutional frameworks. To support this view, I recall and adapt the classical concept of ‘polyarchy,’ coined in the early 1950s by Robert A. Dahl. It consists of a two‐dimensional theoretical construct applicable for measuring the level of liberalization in modern political societies. It follows that the more actors who take part in politics, and the more such institutions allow political opposition, the more open a society (of states) is likely to be. I therefore assess and rate the level of polyarchization of 23 GIGOs that cover various issue areas and fit some specific criteria (for example, more than one hundred member states from at least three different continents). Methodology includes a scorecard developed to help achieve these research objectives. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 29, No.4; Dec 2016: p.1233-1258 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 29 No 4 |
| Key Words | Liberalization ; Liberal Politics ; Global Intergovernmental Organizations ; Robert Dahl’s Political Theory ; Modern Political Societies |