| ID | 153885 |
| Title Proper | Not completely the new normal |
| Other Title Information | how Human Rights watch tried to suppress the targeted killing norm |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jose, Betcy |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | How do human rights groups prevent the normalization of practices they find troubling? Existing international relations research provides insights into how states resist the new norms human rights activists introduce into the global arena. But it tells us less about how governments themselves promote norms and how activists push back against this advocacy. This article explores this issue by examining the interplay between Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the United States around the emerging norm of targeted killing. It argues that Bin Laden’s death opened a window of opportunity for the potential emergence of a targeted killing norm, with the United States as its norm advocate. To prevent its emergence, HRW deployed some of the same strategies states have used to suppress the emergence of norms they dislike. In illustrating these dynamics, this article helps us better understand why some norms rise, why some fall, and why they might change over time. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 38, No.2; Aug 2017: p.237-259 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol: 38 No 2 |
| Key Words | International Order ; International Norms ; Targeted Killings ; Human Rights Watch ; Norm Emergence ; Norm Suppression ; Norm Life Cycle Model |