Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:864Hits:19878964Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID153887
Title ProperFriction, not erosion
Other Title Informationassassination norms at the fault line between sovereignty and liberal values
LanguageENG
AuthorGroßklaus, Mathias
Summary / Abstract (Note)Reframed as “targeted killing,” state-sponsored assassination is moving toward normalization. I maintain that this development can only be understood in the context of long-standing frictions between meta-norms. The regulation of assassination as an instrument of foreign policy is a normative amalgam that is connected to both state sovereignty and liberal thought. Those discursive links structure both the evolution of the norm and its transformation, as they can be invoked by actors in order to reinterpret and reshape it. As I argue, the prevalent “norm erosion” perspective fails to grasp such incremental processes in that it tends to limit its analytical view to single, narrowly defined norms and overemphasizes external shocks. I thus stress the need for a more comprehensive account of normative change that highlights the surrounding meta-norms that are able to connect single norms to their larger position within the international order.
`In' analytical NoteContemporary Security Policy Vol. 38, No.2; Aug 2017: p.260-280
Journal SourceContemporary Security Policy Vol: 38 No 2
Key WordsSovereignty ;  International Order ;  Assassination ;  Norms ;  Targeted Killing ;  Norm Erosion


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text