| ID | 153952 |
| Title Proper | Mind the gap |
| Other Title Information | civilian protection and the politics of peace operation design |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Everett, Andrea L |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Protecting civilians from conflict and atrocities has become a major focus of governments, the UN, and activists. Yet peace operations—the main policy instrument for directly shielding civilians from violence—vary widely in how well they are designed to do so. One much-maligned problem is a gap between a force's ambitions to protect civilians and its physical resources for doing so. Missions plagued by these ambitions–resources gaps gesture toward protecting civilians but are not designed to do so effectively. They can also worsen civilian suffering. This article explores the politics behind these gaps, focusing on the role of powerful states—especially major Western democracies—in creating and facilitating them. It argues that ambitions–resources gaps represent a form of organized hypocrisy that helps political leaders balance competing normative and material pressures to protect civilians while limiting costs and risks. Case studies of France's Operation Turquoise in Rwanda and US support for the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) in Darfur support the argument. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 26, No.2; Apr-Jun 2017: p.213-248 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 26 No 2 |
| Key Words | African Union Mission ; Civilian Protection ; United Nations ; Politics of Peace Operation Design ; France's Operation |