Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:368Hits:19890310Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID154483
Title ProperState of exception’ or ‘state in exile’? the fallacy of appropriating Agamben on Palestinian refugee camps
LanguageENG
AuthorTuastad, Dag
Summary / Abstract (Note)To refer to Palestinian refugee camps as states of exception, appropriating the paradigm of Giorgio Agamben, is definitely tempting. Agamben argues that in times of crisis, individual rights of citizens are diminished and entire categories of people kept outside the political system. Nevertheless, there are flaws in applying Agamben’s perspective on Palestinian camps. It acquits the camp residents from the autonomy over their own political agency. Historically, in Lebanon, camp residents experienced an almost limitless access to free political organisation. But this access has not been converted into the development of representative, legitimate political structures.
`In' analytical NoteThird World Quarterly Vol. 38, No.9; 2017: p.2159-2170
Journal SourceThird World Quarterly Vol: 38 No 9
Key WordsPalestine ;  Authoritarianism ;  Democratisation ;  Participation and Power ;  Migration and Refugees


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text