Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:916Hits:19873007Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID154659
Title ProperCleansing the nation of the “dogs of hell
Other Title InformationAli Jumʿa's nationalist legal reasoning in support of the 2013 egyptian coup and its bloody aftermath
LanguageENG
AuthorWarren, David H
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article contributes to an emerging scholarly debate over the support displayed by key Azhari ʿulamaʾ for the 3 July 2013 coup in Egypt and the subsequent massacres of anticoup protesters. I focus on the Islamic legal justifications articulated by the former grand mufti of Egypt ʿAli Jumʿa, which academics have contextualized primarily in relation to quietist precedents from late medieval Islamic political thought or his Sufi background. By contrast, I consider Jumʿa's justifications as representative of a nationalist discourse that has its historical origins in the protonationalism of Rifaʿa al-Tahtawi (d. 1873). My argument has wider implications for our conceptualization of the contemporary Islamic tradition. If, as scholars have argued, the Islamic tradition is a framework for inquiry rather than a set of doctrines, then in the 19th century a concern for the nation and its future became a key part of that framework. I contend that these additions came to redefine the worldview and politics of the ʿulamaʾ in terms of national progress and its horizon of expectations.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Journal of Middle East Studies Vol. 49, No.3; Aug 2017: p.457-477
Journal SourceInternational Journal of Middle East Studies 2017-09 49, 3
Key WordsNationalism ;  Politics ;  Egypt ;  Coup ;  Islam