Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:479Hits:19925680Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID154939
Title ProperIncreasing U.S.–China strategic competition
Other Title Informationimplications for Pakistan
LanguageENG
AuthorFouzia Amin and Khurshid Khan ;  Amin, Fouzia ;  Khan, Khurshid
Summary / Abstract (Note)Historically, China had been a great power and had maintained the largest economy
in the world for quite a long time. It would, therefore, like to regain its lost status.
There is consensus among many scholars that China would rise peacefully by
adopting the five “principles of peaceful co-existence”, thus, it would take a leading
role in the 21st century. It is viewed that the United States is already convinced to a
great extent that it might not be able to maintain sole dominance for too long in the
backdrop of the rising Chinese economic and military power. Based on an in-depth
analysis of the issue, the study concludes that China would avoid clashing with
Washington and its allies while protecting its economic interests across the globe.
Nevertheless, the Chinese would react if their core interests are threatened by the
United States and its allies including India. In order to protect its long-term interest
in the region and beyond, China would gradually develop its military including its
maritime capabilities to increase its influence beyond China’s periphery. However;
it is highly unlikely that in the near future, China would contest the United States
and its allies beyond the South China Sea. The study also concludes that in this
great ongoing game between the quadrangles of the countries, if India makes a
principle decision to stand by the United States in the case of a conflict with China
over the Indian Ocean, such a scenario would limit Pakistan’s options to either join
China or stay neutral. Either of the two options would pose a serious challenge for
Pakistan. A decision to stay outside the Great Powers’ power politics would be even
more difficult.
`In' analytical NoteKorean Journal of Defence Analysis Vol. 29, No.3; Sep 2017: p.475-493
Journal SourceKorean Journal of Defence Analysis Vol: 29 No 3
Key WordsSoft Power ;  Strategic Alliance ;  Confrontation ;  Maritime Capability ;  Great Powe ;  Apprehensive ;  Complex Economic Interdependency


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text