| ID | 155069 |
| Title Proper | Analysing voting inconsistency in the United Nations General Assembly |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Panke, Diana ; Brazys, Samuel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In many international institutions, contested norms pass via voting. Although votes express national positions, dynamic vote shifts are a widespread phenomenon. Why do states sometimes change their voting stances concerning re-occurring international rules and norms? To explain observed variation, this analysis theorises the role of domestic and external windows of opportunity as well as the role of lobbying in the United Nations General Assembly. It shows that changes in government composition and changes in the text of re-occurring international rules and norms matter. Yet, whilst resourceful actors more likely change their voting stance after having successfully negotiated text changes, less powerful states are more likely to shift voting stances in response to third party lobbying. |
| `In' analytical Note | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 28, No.3; Sep 2017: p.538-560 |
| Journal Source | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol: 28 No 3 |
| Key Words | United Nations General Assembly ; Analysing Voting Inconsistency |