| ID | 155238 |
| Title Proper | Colombian paradox |
| Other Title Information | peace processes, elite divisions & popular plebiscites |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Matanock, Aila M ; Miguel García-Sánchez ; García-Sánchez, Miguel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Ending civil conflict is difficult, particularly through political settlements. Conflicts now often occur in states with elections, and voters have sometimes been directly involved in the process, potentially in efforts to overcome elite divisions. Yet, according to evidence from the 2016 popular plebiscite in Colombia, referendums and other tools of direct approval by voters seem to amplify elite divisions and therefore are not a useful mechanism to strengthen peace processes in this way. Focusing instead on traditional elite-led negotiations that seek to satisfy each faction may have a better chance of producing signed settlements, although the Colombian case also suggests some alternative forms of inclusivity that may help increase the overall legitimacy of the process and improve the odds of implementation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Daedalus Vol. 146, No.4; Fall 2017: p.152-166 |
| Journal Source | Daedalus Vol: 146 No 4 |
| Key Words | Peace Processes ; Colombian Paradox ; Elite Divisions ; Popular Plebiscites |