| ID | 155479 |
| Title Proper | Back to the future |
| Other Title Information | ‘retro’ trade governance and the future of the multilateral order |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wilkinson , Rorden |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article reflects on the role crises play in enabling existing systems of global economic governance to evolve and endure while also preserving underlying power dynamics. The article uses as its case-study global trade governance. Its aim is to explore the impact of the negotiating crises that beset the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Doha round of trade negotiations. The article traces how, over the course of the Doha round, periodic crises resulting from divergent pressures for opposing outcomes combined to preclude one set of institutional developments from resulting (those on which the Doha round had been launched and the basis upon which developing countries negotiated) while enabling others (those advanced by the leading industrial states). The result has been to usher in changes that have returned global trade governance to a form of system management more familiar to observers of the multilateral trading system of the 1970s. This ‘retro’ form of trade governance signals a departure from the more inclusive system that had emerged from the Uruguay round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and evolved during the WTO's early years, replacing it with a lither system of mini-lateralism more fit for industrial country purposes. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 93, No.5; Sep 2017: p.1131–1147 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 93 No 5 |
| Key Words | GATT ; Law ; Ethics Political Economy and Economics ; International Governanc |