Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4534Hits:25702404Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID155590
Title ProperWhy are there no universal social programs in the United States?:
Other Title Informationa historical institutionalist comparison with Canada
LanguageENG
AuthorBeland, Daniel ;  Waddan, Alex
Summary / Abstract (Note)Much has been written about “American exceptionalism” in social policy, but one aspect has received relatively little attention thus far: the absence of universal public social programs where entitlements to benefits and services are derived from citizenship or residency. This absence is especially striking because other liberal welfare regimes such as Canada and the United Kingdom have long developed such programs. Focusing on policy design and using Canada as a contrasting case, this article explains why there are no universal social programs in the United States, a country where the dichotomy between social assistance and social insurance dominates. The empirical analysis focuses on three policy areas: health, pensions, and family benefits. Stressing the impact of institutional factors on policy design, the article adopts a historical institutionalist approach and shows that the explanation for the absence of universal social programs varies from one policy area to the next.
`In' analytical NoteWorld Affairs US Vol. 180, No.1; Spring 2017: p.64-92
Journal SourceWorld Affairs US Vol: 180 No 1
Key WordsUnited States ;  Canada ;  Welfare State ;  Social Security ;  Welfare ;  Social Insurance ;  Historical Institutionalism ;  Social Policy ;  Universal Social Programs ;  Comparative Welfare Systems


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text