Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:603Hits:19488861Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID155695
Title ProperOne measure cannot trump it all
Other Title Information lessons from NATO’s early burden-sharing debates
LanguageENG
AuthorKunertova, Dominika
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper calls for a qualitative turn in discussing NATO burden-sharing. The paper takes issue with the numerical burden-sharing narrative in NATO and identifies its two main problems. Despite being simple, the 2% defence spending pledge lacks other basic attributes of any contributory system: fairness and effectiveness. Drawing from concepts of distributive justice, the paper analyses NATO’s first burden-sharing debates and demonstrates that due to their qualitatively different capabilities, the allies agreed on an egalitarian ability-to-pay distributive justice. Furthermore, it shows that the allies refrained from implementing fairness in terms of a one-size-fits-all formula, since this simple numerical approach could not produce fair and effective burden-sharing at the same time. Rather, they developed a dynamic framework for optimal sharing. These formative burden-sharing debates provide valuable lessons learned for the current build-up of NATO’s posture: less focused on formal sharing, more concerned with strategic outputs.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Security Vol. 26, No.4; Dec 2017: p.552-574
Journal SourceEuropean Security Vol: 26 No 4
Key WordsNATO ;  Burden-Sharing ;  Distributive Justice ;  Fairness ;  Trump ;  Intra-Alliance Cooperation


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text