| ID | 155789 |
| Title Proper | Wrong done to mankind |
| Other Title Information | colonial perspectives on the notion of universal crime |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Graf, Sinja |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Current debates on ‘crimes against humanity’ address its history and its potentially neo-imperial effects in international relations. In reference to these issues, this essay abstracts the idea of universal crime from the contemporary concept of ‘crimes against humanity’ and analyzes its mobilizations in early-modern perspectives on the legitimacy of European colonialism. First theorizing the easy union between notions of universal crime and arguments about European imperialism, I then draw on arguments by Vitoria, Gentili, and Grotius. I find that they rely on the idea of an offense injuring all mankind to negotiate colonial relationships between European powers and peoples abroad as well as between European powers vis-à-vis one another, both within Europe and in non-European spaces. The essay concludes by offering three venues for inquiry into the concepts of universal crime and crimes against humanity, namely their political productivity, their historical circulation, and their contemporary neo-imperial character. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol. 31, No.3; Sep 2017: p.299-321 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol: 31 No 3 |
| Key Words | Crimes Against Humanity ; Grotius ; Intellectual History ; European Colonialism ; Vitoria ; International Law ; Imperialism ; International Relations ; Gentili ; History of International Political Thought ; Universal Crime |