Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1120Hits:19583477Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID156093
Title ProperChanging the system through instrumentalizing weak political institutions
Other Title Information the quest for a presidential system in Turkey in historical and comparative perspective
LanguageENG
AuthorAslan Akman, Canan ;  Akçalı, Pınar
Summary / Abstract (Note)

Since the 1990s, debates on a constitutional system reform in Turkey have ignited controversies over the executive structure of its parliamentary system. This article looks at the debate in terms of the interaction between institutional dynamics and politicians’ choices, shaped by past institutional transformations following transitions. It is contended that institutional weaknesses underlying both the presidency and executive–legislative relations in Turkey have provided strong incentives for incumbent elites to challenge existing parliamentary norms and advocate presidential alternatives. Far from contributing to a sober diagnosis of the problems of parliamentarism, the recent constitutional amendment introducing a system of executive presidency has further divided Turkey’s already polarized political and civil society.
`In' analytical NoteTurkish Studies Vol. 18, No.4; Dec 2017: p.577-600
Journal SourceTurkish Studies 2017-12 18, 4
Key WordsInstitutionalization ;  Presidentialism ;  Turkish Politics ;  Constitutional Reform ;  Executive–Legislative Relations