| ID | 156520 |
| Title Proper | Earthquakes and the typologies of state–society relations in China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Sun, Taiyi |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The proliferation of civil society organizations after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2013 Lushan earthquake in China has caught the attention of scholars in Chinese politics and disaster politics. Immediately after the earthquakes and during the recovery period, civil society organizations were given a rare opportunity to work closely and intensely with the state. As a result, these organizations adjusted their behaviour – sometimes compromising with the state on many fronts – in exchange for better relations with the state and in order to achieve their goals, but they had to work in new and creative ways. Drawing on evidence from a dozen case studies and 61 in-depth interviews with government officials and leaders of civil society organizations in Sichuan Province, this article argues that we can map the state’s preferences and policy distinctions through its varied responses to these organizations during an earthquake recovery period. Specifically, whether the state is more effective in delivering public goods and services in a given area and whether the goals of civil society organizations align with those of state are two key determinants of relations between the state and civil society organizations. This article proposes a comprehensive typology of such relations in China: complementary, cooperative, competitive and confrontational. These categories are not static, because the government and civil society organizations adjust their policies and behaviour as they interact. These learning experiences, triggered by the earthquakes, create a dynamic process of evolving state–society relations in China today. |
| `In' analytical Note | China Information Vol. 31, No.3; Nov 2017: p.304-326 |
| Journal Source | China Information 2017-12 31, 3 |
| Key Words | Civil Society ; Chinese Politics ; Authoritarian Resilience ; State–Society Relations ; Disaster Politics |