Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:355Hits:19924279Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID156538
Title ProperPrince—or better no prince? the strategic value of appointing a successor
LanguageENG
AuthorKonrad, Kai A ;  Mui, Vai-Lam
Summary / Abstract (Note)Appointing a successor (the “prince”) allows the ruler (the “king”) to alter the structures of conflicts that take place between him and his potential challengers, as well as the structures of conflicts that take place among his potential challengers. Motivated by historical examples and using an infinite horizon rulership competition game, we show that while an appointed prince constitutes a powerful and dangerous threat to the incumbent ruler (the elevated threat effect), the appointed prince can also offer the incumbent ruler increased protection against other potential challengers (the barrier effect). We determine conditions when the overall effect of appointing a successor benefits the incumbent ruler and enables him to acquire a larger share of the governance rent in equilibrium.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 61, No.10; Nov 2017: p.2158-2182
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 61 No 10
Key WordsCoup ;  Ruler ;  Governance Rent ;  Successorship Regimes


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text