Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1149Hits:18694816Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID156552
Title ProperThrowing stones in social science
Other Title InformationNon-violence, unarmed violence, and the first intifada
LanguageENG
AuthorPressman, Jeremy
Summary / Abstract (Note)Social scientists treat stone-throwing as a non-violent act or argue that protest movements may be primarily non-violent despite stone-throwing. However, this study of an iconic example, the first intifada (Palestinian uprising, 1987–1993), demonstrates that stone-throwing is better characterized as unarmed violence. Definitions of violence underscore that throwing rocks is a violent act. Moreover, informed observers and data collected on stone-induced injuries during four years of the intifada illustrate the bodily harm caused by stones. The throwing of stones was central to the intifada and its identity and definition. Stone-throwing was the most visible tactic Palestinians used in the first intifada. Lastly, most scholars emphasize the protestors’ perceptions when it might be that the targets’ perceptions matter more for understanding definitions of (non-)violence and subsequent policy changes. These findings challenge important social science work and the mainstream Israeli and Palestinian narratives about the first intifada.
`In' analytical NoteCooperation and Conflict Vol. 52, No.4; Dec 2017: p.519-536
Journal SourceCooperation and Conflict 2017-12 52, 4
Key WordsSecurity ;  Political Violence ;  Non-violence ;  Israel–Palestine ;  Uprising (intifada)