| ID | 156607 |
| Title Proper | Rethinking China's coercive capacity |
| Other Title Information | an examination of PRC domestic security spending, 1992–2012 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Greitens, Sheena Chestnut |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Discussions of China's rising domestic security expenditure often present this spending as evidence of the Chinese Communist Party's strong coercive capacity. This article argues that a lack of theoretical clarity about domestic security has resulted in flawed conclusions about these expenditures and their implications for China's coercive capacity. Challenging the conventional wisdom, the article analyses China's domestic security spending from 1992 through 2012 and argues that it is important to consider not only the total amount that China spends but also how it spends these resources and the magnitude of the threats that this expenditure must address. It finds that China's domestic security spending is not historically unprecedented, is not expanding as a proportion of national expenditure, and is not necessarily high (or producing high coercive capacity) when compared to other countries. The article also shows that certain locations struggle more to fund their coercive capacity than others, and that these locations overlap with areas where internal security threats may be particularly acute. The challenges that the coercive apparatus must address have also grown over the same period during which domestic security spending has risen. Finally, attempts to improve the political position of China's coercive agents cannot be equated with improvements in their capacity to manage Chinese society. Cumulatively, this reassessment provides more evidence of the limitations on China's coercive capacity than of its strength. |
| `In' analytical Note | China Quarterly , No.232; Dec 2017: p.1002-1025 |
| Journal Source | China Quarterly No 232 |
| Key Words | Internal Security ; Policing ; Domestic Security ; Public Security ; Coercive Capacity ; Authoritarian Stability ; Stability Management (weiwen)Commission on Law and Politics (zhengfawei) |