| ID | 156674 |
| Title Proper | Clausewitzian fallacy of absolute war |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Holmes, Terence M |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Clausewitz was much preoccupied with the apparent contradiction between real and absolute war. Why did war in history so rarely exhibit the extremes of violence and energy implied in the pure concept of war? Clausewitz’s commentators have usually followed him in thinking that this was a genuine problem in need of a solution, but I want to question that view. I will argue that Clausewitz did not have a coherent philosophy of absolute war, and therefore the contradiction he posited between real and absolute war was equally meaningless – as, too, was his effort to resolve it by claiming that some real wars approached or even attained the absolute form of war. The real problem was not the opposition of real and absolute war, but the self-contradictory theory of absolute war. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 40, No.7; Dec 2017: p.1039-1058 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 40 No 7 |
| Key Words | War and politics ; Clausewitz ; Military Theory ; Philosophy of war ; Absolute War |