| ID | 156839 |
| Title Proper | Has the top two primary elected more moderates? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | McGhee, Eric ; Eric McGhee and Boris Shor ; Shor, Boris |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Party polarization is perhaps the most significant political trend of the past several decades of American politics. Many observers have pinned hopes on institutional reforms to reinvigorate the political center. The Top Two primary is one of the most interesting and closely-watched of these reforms: a radically open primary system that removes much of the formal role for parties in the primary election and even allows for two candidates of the same party to face each other in the fall. Here we leverage the adoption of the Top Two in California and Washington to explore the reform’s effects on legislator behavior. We find an inconsistent effect since the reform was adopted in these two states. The evidence for post-reform moderation is stronger in California than in Washington, but some of this stronger effect appears to stem from a contemporaneous policy change—district lines drawn by an independent redistricting commission—while still more might have emerged from a change in term limits that was also adopted at the same time. The results validate some claims made by reformers, but question others, and their magnitude casts some doubt on the potential for institutions to reverse the polarization trend. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 15, No.4; Dec 2017: p.1053-1066 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics 2017-12 15, 4 |
| Key Words | Party Polarization ; Primary Elected ; More Moderates ; Political Trend |