| ID | 157100 |
| Title Proper | Decisions at the data border: |
| Other Title Information | Discretion, discernment and security |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hall, Alexandra |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Discussions about the legitimacy of private security companies (PSCs) in multilateral military interventions abound. This article looks at how the United States has sought to legitimize the outsourcing of security services to PSCs through performance-based contracting and performance assessments. Both mechanisms aim to demonstrate the effective provision of publicly desirable outcomes. However, the immaterial and socially constructed nature of security presents major problems for performance assessments in terms of observable and measurable outcomes. Performance has therefore given way to performativity – that is, the repetitive enactment of particular forms of behaviour and capabilities that are simply equated with security as an outcome. The implications of this development for the ways in which security has been conceptualized, implemented and experienced within US interventions have been profound. Ironically, the concern with performance has not encouraged PSCs to pay increased attention to their impacts on security environments and civilian populations, but has fostered a preoccupation with activities and measurable capabilities that can be easily assessed by government auditors. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 48, No.6; Dec 2017: p.488-504 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol: 48 No 6 |
| Key Words | Security ; Decision ; Border ; Data ; Discretion |